I wonder why mail services and social networks don’t provide a “CreditScore” service, where an email or social media account’s trustworthiness is numerically assessed?
There are numerous factors influencing the CreditScore: the same CreditScores of “friends”, i.e., those who receive messages or are on the contact list, content analysis, activity – a plethora of everything. The formula can be as complex and confidential as you want: after all, these are the provider’s rules, and if a user disagrees with the score, they can switch to another service or create a new email (which will have a zero CreditScore).
For complaints with proven facts (like spam), the CreditScore plummets.
Where this might be needed:
1) authentication of an email in various services. For example, you could skip confirming an email for those with a high rating.
2) color-highlighting emails from people with a high Score. For instance, emails from certain score thresholds could be prohibited from being placed in the spam folder.
Of course, people will immediately start looking for ways to boost their CreditScore, but the parameters listed are quite costly to artificially increase. Plus, it’s fairly easy to verify if there’s any complaint, and all efforts could collapse.
Theoretically, a major player, like Mail.Ru, could thereby open up a new market, which other players may enter later, establishing some standard. These CreditScores could merge across different accounts (social networks, mail) of the same person with their consent, thus further enhancing it, etc.
Anna Artamonova, perhaps there’s something useful in this.