May 08 2020, 23:54

Are there any online games in nature that could be played over the internet family against family, engaging all ages and being interesting? The main feature here is that “team” players do not stare into their gadgets, but rather play with one device taking turns.

Shooters won’t do, I’m talking about family games which require thinking and playing collectively, ideally distributed. Not everyone sitting in a corner and blankly staring at their laptop waiting for their turn, but something displayed on a large TV, laying out fruit, juice, and wine, with both our family and our friends, all playing together?

An example from offline would be the game Pandemic, which we once borrowed from friends to play. It can be played by a group, and theoretically distributed. In it, “all cards are open”, everyone plays for themselves, but everyone either wins or loses together. Discussions, debates occur throughout, and it’s a game that could quite suitably be played through Skype. They’ve adapted it to consoles and tablets, but not to the web with multiplayer functionality.

It seems to me that Pandemic is quite fitting at the moment. It involves saving the world through joint effort.

For games where a player has a hand that shouldn’t be shown to others, personal phones could be used, but there is a risk that participants on each side might just be staring into their screens, which isn’t great.

Walking and shooting, as well as online quests, aren’t very suitable because of optional involvement. Playing all together as a single virtual player in a game like poker doesn’t work for the same reason.

Theoretically it’s like running five clients of an online game on one computer and switching between them as turns pass. Another family runs three clients. In the end, for the game server, there are seven players, but the fact that they use only two computers is a minor detail. But here’s the complexity, running five copies of an application on one machine is quite difficult. Let’s say, one opened in Chrome, another in Chrome’s Incognito mode, a third in Firefox, the fourth in its incognito mode, and the fifth in Safari. And spread these out across five screens. Register each under a personal account for each player. And switch between them using Ctrl-left-right. The other family does the same. But this is a very complicated scheme, just preparing for the game will take half an hour.

Let’s start collecting links – in this era of self-isolation, such things should somehow replace communication.

May 08 2020, 00:07

Today, I was salivating over this electric bike with Softwheel wheels. Only cost 400 bucks. The seller knows nothing about it. Interestingly, it seems it was made as a unique prototype four years ago just for a conference presentation, here’s the video, and it looks like this was the very prototype

The video is four years old. E-BSS never really took off, and the wheel company has now shifted its focus to wheelchairs.

I didn’t buy the bike, because I’m not too convinced that it’s without flaws. A single ‘exhibit’ sample can’t be all good except in appearance. But I was really tempted.

It was sold today, after all.

April 29 2020, 12:11

@[100000951008959:2048:Oleg Bunin] and Avito have opened up even more records from past Ontico conferences, specifically from Saint AppsConf 2019, HighLoad++ 2019, DevOpsConf 2019, FrontendConf 2019, Product Fest 2019, TeamLead Conf 2020, GolangConf 2019, UseData Conf 2019. Highly recommended, very interesting.

April 28 2020, 12:47

As if 2020 wasn’t already lacking UFOs!

April 26 2020, 18:49

I will leave my forecast on the development of the situation with the coronavirus. I hesitate to name the country, let’s see how things will develop.

The official number of cases will decline sooner than the actual number. Because it’s not working out, and you can’t shut down the economy for so long because then people will start dying of hunger and cold (at some point you will need to invent a story “why we opened the business”. And this story has to be convincing. If it “doesn’t work”, then it will be chaos, and people will come out with pitchforks. But if the story isn’t launched and the business is kept closed too long, people will come out with pitchforks anyway. Yet with the story, there’s at least a chance that a miracle happens, and everything somehow fixes itself)

Therefore, the informal strategy chosen will be “show a decline, even if there isn’t one”. If the gap between real and official numbers fails to close for a long time, the consequences for the country will be catastrophic regardless of whether you deceived the population or not. But if it quickly zeroes out, then “winners aren’t judged”.

Moreover, there will be few viable ways to prove the discrepancy, and those who try will be labeled as fake news spreaders causing panic, and they will be punished. To reduce the gap, causes of death and diagnoses will begin to be counted very selectively. In the end, the actual number will eventually decline, but later, and some people will die during the pandemic, only part of whom will be recognized as consequences of the virus. Most likely, high mortality will be explained by the presence of chronic diseases in the population, caught decades ago. The risk of infection will be associated with the population not following recommendations.

Businesses will open, but at the same time, the requirements for making them safer will increase. The requirements will be difficult to meet, but no one will actually expect to achieve 100%. For example, a store in the center of a large city may not be able to control the people queuing outside, if the territory doesn’t belong to it but is common with “neighbors”. Ultimately, businesses will always end up being violators, but since so many will violate, there will be a choice of whom to punish urgently and who might still work a couple more years, so the risk will remain with the “uncooperative” and “disloyal”.

Restrictions (all related to the virus) will be lifted significantly slower than business openings. The decrease in the number of cases will be explained by “self-isolation” and “effective sealing of the country’s borders and its parts”. They will wait for a second wave, justifying the decision that it’s too early to lift restrictions. People will get used to asking for permission to move within the city, between cities, and between countries, and gathering in groups (which will automatically solve the rally issue) will start to be seen as normal. All who disrupt the order will be marked as violators, to have the possibility to quarantine those necessary and those not necessary.

A vaccine won’t be made for at least another year, if ever. Simply because — if herd immunity displaces the virus, a vaccine (at least for the current strain) won’t be needed. Political implications will be woven in: no one wants to later admit that the citizens of country A were saved by country B providing the vaccine. Most likely, when a vaccine is made, its “recipe” will be public, but there won’t be money left in the economy to produce the required number of vaccines.

But I think that over time, a cheap antibody test will be developed, and employees with a “I’ve recovered” certificate will be valued higher than those without one. Informally, but still this point will be taken into account. It’s better to put someone on the checkout who won’t kick the bucket a week later due to a “workplace injury”.

Most likely, there will be difficulties with immigration and tourism. When flights resume, testing will be among the actions required before departure (and the cost will be borne by the passenger).

Large industries affected (like airlines, etc.) will become more state-driven. Small companies will be bought out by major players, likely just for real estate and brand. Salaries in some sectors will drop, and the labor market will shift to favor employers.

These are my thoughts. I hope I am wrong. I will check in about six months.