Can you recommend full-length Japanese animated films on par with Hayao Miyazaki or Makoto Shinkai? Something beautiful, smart, interesting for both kids and adults?
P.S. “Your Name” downloaded, will watch it tomorrow
Can you recommend full-length Japanese animated films on par with Hayao Miyazaki or Makoto Shinkai? Something beautiful, smart, interesting for both kids and adults?
P.S. “Your Name” downloaded, will watch it tomorrow
Reading Homo Deus about evolution, I’ve developed a hypothesis. What if ancient organisms had the ability to make elementary decisions about variability, and it wasn’t an absolutely random process? Obviously, I’m not talking about logical thinking in the first amphibians, but rather about a massive decision-making matrix regarding variability, inherent to them since birth, with parameters defined by various experiences. Ultimately, if the issue with pulmonary respiration is already resolved and walking on fins across the beach is inconvenient, the next generation “knows” it would be wise to change in this regard, and something slowly begins to evolve, so that hundreds of millions of years later on the same beach, it wonders why humans aren’t birds. If this is so, for millions of years of evolution, such a considerable part of the neural network in the brain must be filled with such rules, and, when needed, this mechanism neatly initiates variability in the right direction, not at random (well, as far as this neural network knows what ‘right’ is)
In the classical theory with random changes, I dislike that the probabilities of these changes are too small. Certainly, there are hundreds of thousands and millions of years for such random experiments, but it only works effectively in enormous populations with rapid reproduction. For example, when the entire world ocean teems with a single species rapidly reproducing, generations change quickly and the more adapted survive better than the less adapted. But what about species presented in significantly smaller numbers, and with a fairly long life. Well, I don’t know, take, for instance, an elephant. Does it mean that the elephant will evolve over the next million years (if we imagine life/elephants will exist that long – unlikely) just because it’s beneficial in a circus to walk on two legs? I think, with elephants, it might not work out.
And 100000 generations ago, we were still monkeys, for example, and about 10000 generations ago, humans were definitely not monkeys anymore.
If experience can be inherited, then what I write in the first paragraph might indeed exist. The only thing left to prove is that this decision matrix can be transmitted horizontally from species to species, and then everything would be quite beautiful.
To us here Red not chili peppers are coming. Yes, exactly, not hot, but not. I wonder, are there Chinese singing?

Interestingly, the Mosfilm website categorizes “Sadko”, “Scarlet Sails”, and the tale of the wolf and the seven little goats (the film “Mama”) as “Fantasy”. Well, why “Ruslan and Ludmila” and “Munchausen” are also understandable, though barely.
I have always considered Moscow to be the safest capital in the world. Well, after visiting other capitals. Probably, it really is so. But I have also always thought that all cities smaller than Moscow significantly differ in terms of safety. For instance, walking at 1 AM in Balashikha is not safe.
During one of our recent nocturnal strolls, we noticed that we were not at all worried about our safety, even though we hadn’t come across a single person for an hour, only a few cars passed by, and in several places the lighting was barely enough to see where you were stepping. In essence, our walk around our office district somewhat resembled walking through an industrial zone: it’s mostly uninhabited because of all the offices, and generally, no one walks around (we met runners only a few times during dozens of hours of walks). By the way, none of the offices have people at night. The concept of security guards in the offices doesn’t exist; everyone heads home in the evening, and doors open with employee cards. In other words, if you wanted to call for help, probably only a passing car driver could hear you, but with the radio on, windows closed, and no common practice of this, it’s not something to count on. At best, a driver might call the police on their way home.
And yet, there is no crime. Well, that means, there is, but like this:
In the last month, near the house within walking distance, there were about three robberies in “near the metro” areas, but in the countryside (north of the image) there are no crimes at all.
I wonder how Americans manage to ensure safety in areas where everyone is relaxed and no ambush is expected? After all, for criminals, it’s easy prey and minimal risk. It’s puzzling. But somehow, it works.

Real-time photo animation. These guys are doing the impossible, even though the algorithm seems simple. Their previous invention with video animation was also cool. Look for it on Facebooks and iPhones.
Today, returning home at 4:30 in the morning from work, I saw a little fox and several deer near the house. Last time, around the same time, I saw a raccoon. I should somehow go out to the forest with a camera at dawn. It seems that real life there begins at night, and during the day, everyone hides and sleeps there.
What gives away in this photo that it’s Ohio, and not a remote Russian village? I found three clues)

I wanted to joke about how now is the perfect time for Petrosyan and K from Anshlag to run as candidates, but then I remembered this story from my post three years ago, when Jón Gnarr won. The rule of the “Best Party” resulted in a complete restructuring of finances, dozens of kilometers of bicycle paths were built, and schools were reorganized. Tourism growth in Reykjavik was 20%. So, who knows what such jokes might lead to…
I recommend it, a good book. The last three chapters include various standard phrases, which adds practical value to the book.
Presentations, Demos and Training Sessions. A guide to Professional English (Adrian Wallwork)