Hi, I'm Rauf Aliev.

Just a curious feature, stumbled upon it by chance:

You’ve probably never thought about it, but there are words that denote opposite meanings. Linguists call this enantiosemy.

* priceless — “having no price at all” and “having a very high price”

* literally — “exactly, in the direct sense” and “figuratively speaking”

* to eliminate — “to destroy” (eliminate cockroaches) and “to create” (breed a new variety).

* to tie up — “to start” and “to end” (“start a relationship” / “quit alcohol”)

* to launch (to neglect or conversely to give life to something)

* to treat — “to cure” and “to worsen the condition due to treatment” (“doctors treated the wound” / “doctors treated to death”).

* to lend — “to borrow” and “to loan”.

* to bypass — “to walk around, not entering; to pass by” and “to go inside, visiting all possible places” (“the squad bypassed the village, not wanting to engage in battle” / “the squad went around the village looking for enemies”).

* to pass — “to move on transport from point A to point B” and “in the process of moving from point A to point B, to miss point B and go further.”

* to listen — “to listen attentively, to hear” and “not to hear clearly, to forget what was heard”;

* to overlook — “to inspect carefully” and “not to notice something due to inattentiveness”.

* to share [experiences, love <-> an apple, a carcass]

* to review and to miss, to listen [to a lecture <-> the most interesting part]

* to depart [from severe illness <-> to the next world]

* sanction — “to permit” and “to prohibit”.

Oh, here’s another interesting one. “Cockroaches have infested” and “cockroaches divorced.” Clearly different meanings, still funny and almost the same, although it sounds like antonyms 🙂

In English, there are also

* Oversight and Overlook can mean both “accidentally missing something” and “watching carefully” (essentially, the same batch as the Russian ‘to overlook’)

* Sanction can mean both “approve” and “penalize”.

* “to table smth” can mean “to discuss at a meeting” or “to postpone for better times”

And in English, the word shit can mean both super and complete trash.

In French and Chinese, the words for “to rent out” and “to rent” are the same (louer / 租)

Interestingly, in Hindi कल means both “yesterday” and “tomorrow,” and the Korean 앞(ap) can mean both “future” and “past” 🙂

Also, there are phrases — “The kettle takes a long time to boil” and “The kettle does not boil for a long time” mean the same thing.

And we also say, what a weird habit of Americans to say “how’s it going” / “how are you” basically as a hello. But then in the same Russian language, when we say goodbye, we somehow say “Let’s go!”.

And when we drop something, we say “Quietly” or “Carefully”.

We also say “hands haven’t gotten around to watching it.” And “grab your legs and go” — what is that even?

And in the Russian language, the words for candy (lollipop) and icicle are mixed up.

There are many such oddities in Russian that can be quite difficult to explain to a foreigner. For example, how do you explain that “goat” (koza) and “billy goat” (kozel) are the same animal, but different genders, while “wasp” (osa) and “donkey” (osel) are completely different?

Or why do “eat like a pig” and “get drunk like a pig” denote completely different things? If the first one is about overeating, then the second case does not seem to involve eating at all.

Or, how do you explain to a foreigner that “very smart” is not always a compliment, “smart very” is a mockery, and “too smart” is a threat?..

Go figure explaining to a foreigner why we can say “There he is!”

Yuki

Do you know what the funniest part about this news is? No, not the speed of 27 Mach, where there simply are no materials capable of withstanding the friction at such speed against the atmosphere for 10 seconds. The funny part is something else. The comparison of the rocket to a meteorite is very apt. The president apparently forgot his school astronomy, where it was explained that meteorites do not move at all until someone picks them up. By definition, a meteorite becomes a meteorite when the speed of the meteoroid arriving from space becomes zero. There, it became zero – and a meteorite appeared. Thus, a meteorite by definition is the remnants lying on the ground of various things that really flew into the atmosphere at speeds of 30-50 Mach, and most of which remained there as vapor. And what ultimately acquired zero speed and rest – that is a meteorite.

Another scenario, when a warhead is delivered to its target at 27 and even much higher speeds of sound, is when the target is more or less in the same area as the warhead.

Yesterday, I decided to play the shell game with Yuki. At first, he didn’t catch on to what was expected of him, but then Nadya said that he needed a demonstration, sat next to him, and showed him how to do it, after which he got the hang of it (he probably still thinks Nadya eats his treats). The most interesting part didn’t make it into the video because there was no one to film it! Here I am teaching him to use his paw to point to where the treat is hidden. The next step could be to start confusing him.

I was researching whether I need a rice cooker like Zojirushi when I already have a pressure cooker with a “rice” mode. I’ve come to some conclusions (see below). I think I should share it with Facebook since I have it. I’d appreciate any links that could provide details that weren’t covered in my findings and thoughts.

So, what are we comparing. There are specialized rice cookers (rice cooker). Among the decent ones are Zojirushi, Cuchen, Cookoo. All three brands make very good (and expensive), good, and so-so (inexpensive) versions. All three brands are from Asia, where they definitely understand rice better than we do. Expensive ones are all above 400 dollars for a rice cooker. Inexpensive ones are all under 120.

Pressure cookers (pressure cooker) mostly cost between 150 and 250 dollars. Popular in the USA are Instant Pod, Quick Power Pot, Ninja. There are interesting options like the Breville BPR700BSS.

Thus, the cheapest decent rice cooker is definitely more expensive than a similar class pressure cooker. And if you consider the good and very good ones, the gap is pretty significant.

Rice cookers not only cook rice but are specifically marketed as rice cookers. It’s implied that everything else is a bonus. Pressure cookers are marketed for all-around use, and they can also cook rice.

Frankly speaking, if you cook everything together, odors will transfer from dish to dish because a typical pressure cooker cannot be perfectly cleaned. There will be nooks where odors gather. For rice connoisseurs, this may be important.

We are currently discussing only rice. Because otherwise, there’s no need to choose—just get a pressure cooker.

Rice cookers usually have a smaller pot. Pressure cookers can have a huge one. Rice cookers might cook rice longer than pressure cookers. Why are they more expensive then? Let’s figure it out.

What’s the classic rice recipe? Rinse, soak, bring to a boil, remove heat, don’t let the steam escape, and after about 18 minutes, turn off the heat, stir, rice is ready. Seems simple. Rice cookers of course don’t rinse the rice and don’t stir. Neither do pressure cookers. Then why are rice cookers more expensive?

There’s what’s visible to the naked eye—their pot is better quality and smaller-sized. Why is this important? Rice absorbs water 1:1. So, one cup of rice absorbs one cup of water. If you pour exactly 1:1, the rice will definitely burn because absorption is uneven, and the surface will become dry. Therefore, it’s necessary for the rice to be in saturated steam. That requires excess water. How much water is needed? That depends on how big the pot is and how much rice is in it. In other words, if the classic ratio is one cup of rice to 1.5 cups of water, then increasing the rice threefold with the same pot means you need less than 3*1.5=4.5 cups of water. It becomes mushy. You need less, but by how much depends on how much space the steam needs to fill. Also, on how sealed it is. If the lid is not tightly closed, steam escapes faster, and more water is needed.

Accordingly, the first reason a rice cooker makes tastier rice is due to the limitation of rice volume in a relatively small pot compared to a pressure cooker. You technically can’t cram a lot in there. Or for example, put a small amount of rice in a pot where 60% will remain empty. This space must be filled with steam, prolonging the boiling, all of which affects the taste.

There are good rice cookers with larger pots. But classic models from the good ones have small pots.

Both rice cookers and pressure cookers have very tightly sealed lids, and steam only escapes when the pressure exceeds a certain threshold. The pressure rises then all the water turns into steam, which then starts to overheat. Once a certain pressure is reached, the device automatically regulates the temperature to keep the pressure stable. The temperature sensor is located at the bottom, near the heating plate. The pressure sensor is located in the lid.

Pressure cookers first heat the pot, creating superheated steam, then depending on the program, it cuts off by temperature. For example, when cooking meat, the temperature can reach 120 degrees Celsius, which is 20 degrees above the boiling point of water. However, because there is high pressure, the water does not boil.

In the case of cooking rice, depending on the recipe, it may not be necessary to bring it up to 120 degrees Celsius. It needs to be heated, wait for pressure to build up. But it should heat up evenly and quickly.

Pressure cookers are “dumb” in design. They usually don’t have a microprocessor; there’s essentially a chip with a program laid out “hardware-wise”. They are made as cheap as possible to sell millions.

However, rice cookers have a microprocessor, for which more complex algorithms are developed. Marketers call this Fuzzy Logic. Generally, no one stops them from making cheap electronics, but manufacturers limit demand with the price, and the money goes into better quality “hardware”. For example, induction heating.

=Pressure cookers usually heat the pot from below=. After reaching pressure, the pressure cooker immediately indicates how much time is left until the end. Most likely, it turns off the heating and just waits, maintaining a temperature around X. What that value is for rice I do not understand, but it is some value.

=A good rice cooker heats the pot from all sides=. The pot itself is made of material that evenly distributes heat. This provides even heat distribution and prevents rice from burning. Some rice cooker models use induction heating, which allows for more precise temperature control and quick response to changes – for example, to turn off the heating very quickly. Pressure cookers don’t have this; they use a regular heating element.

Additionally, in pressure cookers, temperature control is usually less precise compared to rice cookers. Together with the heating technology (only the bottom), this is a downside.

Furthermore. There are many varieties of rice, and for instance, Zojirushi went the extra mile, making different programs for different types of rice so that the result would be very good. Since the Japanese understand rice much better than we do, it makes sense to trust them. Pressure cookers generally know two kinds of rice – white and brown.

Also, rice cookers have pots of the right shape. Their bottoms are closer to a sphere than those of pressure cookers, which have an angle. Plus, rice cookers have non-stick coating. All this, besides the flavor of the rice, makes the cookware very easy to maintain after cooking.

Honestly, these are the biggest pluses, the rest are marketing tricks and all kinds of subtleties, which to understand, you need to eat this rice every day since infancy. For instance, you can extend the soaking time and the finishing time (when the rice waits after cooking), there are GABA modes for brown rice,

Reading Musk’s biography. His second wife, Talulah, was quite the schemer. For Musk’s 42nd birthday in June 2013, she rented a castle (a fake, of course. We don’t have real castles here) in Tarrytown, NY, and threw a Japanese steampunk-themed party. In the first photo, a blindfolded guy is throwing knives at Musk, and in the second photo, Musk is trying to topple a 150-kilogram sumo wrestler. Eventually, he did topple him, but it seems the guy twisted Musk’s neck in the process. They fixed it with three surgeries on 5-6 vertebrae. Everything turned out fine in the end, but kudos to the wife)

Bright!

very cool

It’s a pity he never makes it to our parts

Finished listening to Jeff Bezos’s interview (with Lex Fridman). I liked the part about how to conduct perfect business meetings. I compare this to what I read about fifteen years ago in Barbara Minto’s book about her “pyramid” for organizing thoughts.

(Probably everyone knew this, I just missed it. Someone will probably recommend I read some business book about it now.)

Bezos’s perfect meeting starts with all participants receiving a well-prepared document — a meeting memo (“Clarity that it’s like angels singing from on high”). The document must be written with such clarity that it sets the tone for the meeting. Essentially, it’s the agenda, only characterized by its thoroughness and structure. Typically, it spans six pages and is presented in a narrative form.

Jeff explains that a typical meeting at Amazon and Blue Origin (I assume, starting from a certain level) begins with a six-page memorandum. The first 30 minutes are devoted to quiet reading and note-taking. Jeff says that this often scares new managers because a bunch of people gather and silently stare at computers or papers. This “classroom learning” approach is necessary because people often don’t find the time to read the memos beforehand, leading to unpreparedness and bluffing. “Reading together raises the level of discussion,” Jeff says.

Comparing it to PowerPoint presentations, he notes that they lose out significantly to the memorandum, because they are more about persuasion than about seeking answers. PowerPoint allows careless thinking to hide behind bullet points, whereas the memorandum requires full sentences and narrative structure, making it hard to hide flaws in reasoning. Writing a good six-page memorandum is a challenging task requiring time, but ultimately it proves more useful for the audience, saving time for the entire team, and in the long term, by providing clear, well-thought-out content and a precise definition of what we want to achieve from the meeting.

Interestingly, when someone starts the meeting by presenting something with PowerPoint, they not only persuade people of something, but also attach the formulation of the problem to their own persona, existing reputation, authority, etc. This makes developing objective solutions difficult. In the case of a memorandum, the discussion revolves more around the problem, and it is less tied to the ability to sell, as well as to who brought it and “sells” it. Bluntly speaking, if a boss gathers subordinates and feeds them something via a presentation, there’s a high chance he will get unanimous support, regardless of the content.

Also, Bezos says that when a presentation unfolds slide by slide, the audience constantly has questions, answers to which might appear on subsequent slides, then new questions arise, and ultimately there’s no time left for proper thinking, instead it’s spent on posing questions that could have been avoided (waiting until the end where there will be answers).

Bezos calls the work of writing these memorandums an entire art and science, as it requires making sure that in half an hour the audience not only understands everything but also leaves comments in the margins: clear topic sentences, precise words — verbs and nouns, avoiding bullet points.

“… Musk also saved money by questioning requirements. … Why should building a couple of cranes for lifting the Falcon 9 cost $2,000,000? He was shown all the Air Force safety requirements.

In the end, SpaceX convinced the military to review the requirements, and the cranes ended up costing $300,000.

..In the rocket, a valve cost thirty times more than a similar valve in a car, so Musk constantly insisted that his team look for components from companies not tied to aerospace.

The latches used by NASA on the ISS cost $1500 each. An SpaceX engineer managed to modify a latch used in a restroom cabin and created a locking mechanism for $30.

When the engineer approached Musk’s office and told him that the air cooling system for the Falcon 9 cargo bay would cost over $3,000,000, he yelled to Gwynne Shotwell in the next office, asking how much a home air conditioning system costs. Around $6000, she said. Thus, the SpaceX team purchased several commercial air conditioners and modified their pumps to work on the rocket.

In the end, they built the launch complex at Cape Canaveral for 1/10th of the usual price

I love such stories 😉