Tag: Biology

Echoes of Anthrax: The Amerithrax Investigation Unveiled | September 02 2025, 13:33

From the museum of the day before yesterday. Probably, some of you remember the notorious case in 2001: shortly after the 9/11 attacks, the USA experienced a series of bioterror attacks: someone mailed letters containing powder with anthrax spores (Bacillus anthracis). This led to the deaths of 5 people and infected 17, but it could have ended much worse for the entire planet. The investigation, known as “Amerithrax,” was conducted by the FBI in collaboration with other agencies and became one of the most complex in history.

.

For those who might not know — the inhalational form of anthrax has a mortality rate of 85–90% without treatment. Symptoms appear after 6 days, by which time dozens will be infected. It can’t be destroyed — spores remain viable for decades in the soil. For example, on the Scottish island of Gruinard, they lingered for nearly 50 years after wartime testing. Only after 50 years had passed and after 280 tons of formaldehyde solution had been sprayed across all 196 hectares of the island, and the most contaminated topsoil around the dispersal site had been removed, did the island become relatively safe. Thus, anthrax could easily be more terrifying than a global nuclear war.

.

So, returning to the subject. Initially, suspicions fell on various individuals, including Iraq or Al-Qaeda, but no evidence was found.

.

The key breakthrough was scientific examination. Scientists analyzed the anthrax strain from the letters — it was the Ames strain used in American laboratories. Using microbial forensics (genetic analysis), they identified unique mutations in the spores that narrowed the source down to flask RMR-1029 in the USAMRIID (United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases) laboratory at Fort Detrick, Maryland.

.

In other words, every living being has names and genealogy from birth, it’s just a matter of willingness to dig into the genealogy. Apparently, controlled substances have their own registry office, so to speak.

.

Bruce Ivins, a microbiologist who worked there, was the custodian of this flask and had direct access (although more than 100 others did as well).

.

Later, investigators gathered circumstantial evidence. Ivins had been working late at the lab just before the mailings in September and October 2001, which was inconsistent with his usual schedule. He could not convincingly explain these hours. Moreover, in early September 2001, he was vaccinated against anthrax, which seemed suspicious. The FBI also accused him of attempting to mislead the investigation: he allegedly provided false anthrax samples to divert suspicion and attempted to frame colleagues. In 2001, Ivins sent an email to colleagues offering the Ames strain for analysis, which might have been an attempt to cover his tracks.

.

Behavioral signs also played a role. Ivins suffered from depression and suicidal thoughts, especially after another suspect (Steven Hatfill) was cleared in 2008. In June 2008, he was hospitalized in a psychiatric clinic, where during therapy, he made statements that the FBI interpreted as “denials without denial” — for example, that he “had no heart for killing” and did not remember participating in the attacks.

.

By 2008, the investigation had narrowed down to Ivins. When he learned that charges were being prepared against him, on July 29, 2008, he took a lethal dose of Tylenol (acetaminophen). Formal charges were never brought. In 2010, the FBI officially closed the case, declaring Ivins the sole perpetrator.

.

However, the conclusions remain controversial: the US National Academy of Sciences noted in 2011 that the genetic examination was not convincing enough for a definitive conclusion, and some microbiologists, victims’ families, and politicians demanded further investigation. As of now, no new discoveries have been made, and the case is considered closed.

Exploring the Boundless Spectrum: The World of Animal Hearing | August 29 2025, 17:56

From my notes as I read Ed Yong’s Immense World—

“..It is known that the range of audible frequencies for animals is different from that of humans, but I didn’t realize just how different. Imagine the highest pitch in the world—it would be just under 20 kHz, as it’s considered the upper limit of the audible range. Both the upper and lower limits tend to decrease with age. Most adults can’t hear sounds over 16 kHz. Anything above 20 kHz we call ultrasound.

.

So, it turns out that our closest relatives, chimpanzees, can hear up to 30 kHz, dogs up to 45 kHz, cats up to 85 kHz, mice up to 100 kHz, and moths even up to 300 kHz. Imagine, there are so many high-frequency sounds around us, and how rich their sound world is compared to our limited one. It would be interesting to wear headphones that compress the range from 20-40000 Hz to 20-15000 Hz. Many animals, such as mice, actively use ultrasound for internal communication, beyond the hearing range of their predators.

.

And when the topic of ultrasound comes up, it’s impossible not to mention bats with their echolocation. Turns out, it’s a wildly interesting topic.”

.

Probably everyone knows that bats successfully hunt in caves, where no light penetrates at all, and they don’t crash into stalactites and stalagmites. There’s an English saying, blind as a bat, but actually, they can see. Some species see better, others worse. But let’s talk about echolocation.

.

In general, it’s just radar. The bat screams, the sound bounces off a tree, comes back into its ears, and it gets information about how far away the tree is and whether to slow down or not. But the devil, as they say, is in the details. “Engineering” ones.

.

Firstly, high-frequency sound attenuates quickly, so you need to shout very loudly for something to bounce back from a few meters away. Beyond that, bats simply don’t “see.” So, they do indeed shout very loudly, and it’s a directed scream. Specifically, they measured 138 decibels, the sound level of a jet engine if you stand next to it. But in the ultrasonic range.

.

Secondly, when they scream so loudly, they need to plug their own ears so as not to kill their sensitive apparatus. It turned out that they have special muscles that block the inner ear during the scream.

.

Thirdly, both they and their prey are on the move, very fast and erratic. Meanwhile, the speed of sound is about 343 meters per second. The bat’s brain must calculate the difference between the signal and the echo, taking into account both its own movement through space and the movement of the prey. It turned out that the bat’s vocal muscles can contract up to 200 times a second. Moreover, the frequency depends on the phase of the hunt. 200 times—that’s the final phase, when the moth is right in front of the nose, and tiny movements need to be tracked.

.

Fourthly, the bat’s brain also has to cope with creating interference between what was shouted out two moments ago and what was shouted out a moment ago. Considering that the sound can echo off the far wall and the near branch. Plus there are waves from the cries of other bats, and they’re usually very numerous in caves. To manage this, they seem to throw a bit different modulation, plus this musculature allows them to “fire” very short pulses—a few milliseconds—and to renew pulses at their own frequency through very short intervals. Imagine what kind of computer in their brains performs the inverse Fourier transform.”

.

So, all this works pretty well in small groups. But for example, the Brazilian free-tailed bats live in groups of millions. Really, together 20 million mouths shout something and wait for their echo from the walls and each other. You can’t just pick modulation and frequencies that easily, but somehow they manage. Not perfectly, and if they gather in a really big bunch in the cave, then they perform their commute to the hunt and back to the cave “by memory” – probably due to issues with echolocation. When a “door” was placed at the entrance to the cave, a bunch of bats crashed into it.

.

Fifth, consider how they determine distance. It’s necessary to calculate the difference between the signal sent and the signal received (amid a bunch of noise from other bats), and for hunting, it needs to be calculated very precisely. And sound of course isn’t light, but 343 meters per second is also a lot. So studies have shown that bats can recognize differences as little as 1-2 millionths of a second, which allows them to determine distance to fractions of a millimeter. In other words, our eyes are significantly less accurate than their ears.

.

Plus, a moth is actually a fairly complex 3D creation that reflects sound differently with its different parts. Otherwise, bats would eat everything that moves. They recognize. In complete darkness. A mouse’s scream contains a whole palette of frequencies, which reflect differently off parts of a moth, and the mouse’s brain somehow manages to translate this into a coherent picture. Moreover, for each of the constituent frequencies, the delay will be its own.

.

Then, all this information is layered over time. Roughly speaking, a snapshot from one point is combined with a snapshot from a point a half meter to the right, then from a point half a meter forward, and so on many, many times, which enhances “sharpness” and detail. Overall, it’s the same with us – we only see the spot in front of us clearly while the rest is constructed by the brain. But the brain of a bat weighs 1-2 grams against our half kilogram.

.

Think about it, you’re flying with such a built-in radar, and in front of you are two branches at the same distance, which produce essentially the same echo for their ears. And to distinguish them and understand that it’s not one object but two, you really need an advanced brain.

.

So, they send pulses lasting 1-20 ms, plus longer pauses between pulses. The pulses are complex in terms of frequencies, so such bats are called frequency modulation (FM) bats. But there are about 160 species that have a much longer cry—many tens of milliseconds but with short pauses, and instead of a complex gamma of frequencies, these use a pure “note.” These bats are called CF—constant frequency. So here’s the thing with these bats—there’s a problem with the Doppler effect, which is an increase in frequency as the distance decreases. Since their brain is tuned to a strict frequency, like 87 kHz for example, they might lose their prey if the echo that reaches their ears is shifted in frequency. And what they do—they shout at a sound speed lower, so that after the Doppler effect it arrives at the correct frequency for the brain.”

.

Incidentally, their radar has two modes—forward and downward, the echoes from which are processed separately. The downward radar provides information about position in space, and the forward radar—about the position in space of the prey.

.

When I researched the subject, I found that yes, after 20 kHz humans hear nothing, with one exception—frequencies of 2.4 GHz and 10 GHz, which actually belong to the microwave range. Yes, humans can “hear” these frequencies, but not with the ear, but “hear.” This phenomenon is called the microwave auditory effect or the Frey effect. Initially, this effect was registered by people working near radars during World War II, and the sounds they perceived were not heard by others. It turned out that when pulsed or modulated microwave radiation was applied to areas around the cochlea, it was absorbed by the tissues of the inner ear, accompanied by their thermal expansion. In the course of this process, shockwaves are produced, perceived by humans as sound, which no one else hears. It was also discovered that with the appropriate choice of the modulating signal, it is possible to transmit information to a person in the form of individual words, phrases, and other sounds. Depending on the radiation parameters, the sound created in the head can be irritating, cause nausea, and even disable. The volume of the perceived sound can be changed, but acoustic trauma is not possible, as the eardrum does not participate in the process at all. Generally speaking, the method of specifically transmitting sonic messages that are absolutely inaudible to others opens up a whole bouquet of possibilities. I wonder if research is still being conducted on this topic. Google shows that they used to be pretty intense.”

I once published this along with a video, and Facebook reckons that if you publish a video, the text should be one, at most two lines. And in the end, almost no one saw this text. Everyone just watched the video of a bat flying around my apartment 🙂

Faces of Language: Understanding the Human and Animal “Face” Across Cultures | July 25 2025, 16:35

I read about a fly on my windowsill, it’s a predatory critter, and its face is described on Wikipedia. Just like that, face. It got me thinking, is the word “face” applicable to animals other than humans (let’s skip the discussion of whether the term animal applies to humans). On the same Wikipedia, but on the face page, the face is only human. Yet, it is written that in professional terminology (veterinary, ornithology, entomology) it is quite appropriate to speak of the “facial part of the head” of an animal. For example, ornithologists at Cornell University use the term “face” specifically in descriptions of owls. Well, fine, we have a face, others have a snout. And birds? A snout in feathers? A beak is something else entirely.

In English too, by the way, things are not so simple. Even a cube has faces. In other European languages, the boundary between a human “face” and an animal one is more or less clearly drawn. Italians use faccia only for humans and muso for animals; faccia for a cat or dog would be inappropriate and even offensive. In French, visage usually means “human face,” and for animals, it’s gueule, museau, tête, etc. In Polish, there’s twarz for people and pysk/morda for beasts; moreover, the word morda in relation to a person is a crude insult (and in Russian too, only adding nationality to it). In Scandinavian languages (“ansigt” in Danish, “ansikte” in Swedish) “face” is also almost always human.

There’s also the word “physiognomy.” Interestingly, it only later came to denote a face. Essentially, this word means “the study of facial features to determine character.” It consists of φύσις (physis) – “nature, essence, character” and γνώμων (gnomon) – “indicator, determining.”

And then I remembered the word “unflattering.” Strange word, right? How can a conversation be unflattering? Turns out, its definition is as follows: “not based on flattery, the desire to please someone; impartial, fair.” So formally, Vitsyn could exclaim, “long live the most unflattering court in the world!” I’m not joking, for example, Saltykov-Shchedrin writes: “At the present time, in all corners of Russia, even the most backward people are beginning to recognize the vital need for a lawful and unflattering court.” “I must confess, I was very nervous, handing my brainchild over to the unflattering judgment of the editorial staff” (D. N. Mamin-Sibiriyak, “Features from the Life of Pepko,” 1894).

Actually, an interesting word. In Russian, its only decent synonyms are snout, mug, phiz, physiognomy, dial, and very memorable indecent ones.

From Forbidden Fruit to Linguistic Roots: The Curious Case of Currants and Smorodina | July 17 2025, 13:09

You know, 99.9% of Americans have never tried blackcurrant. It was legally banned here in 1911 because blackcurrants carried a disease that killed pine trees. And along with it, gooseberries and Kinder Surprise were banned too. It even got to the point where in the USA, purple Skittles are grape-flavored, while in Europe, they taste of blackcurrant.

But today I am thinking about something else. I wondered why in Russian blackcurrant is called ‘smorodina,’ and in English, it’s called ‘currant.’ It turns out that ‘smorodina’ is related to the word ‘smrad,’ which meant a strong smell because, according to our ancestors, it smelled bad. ‘Smrad’ used to mean any strong smell. I don’t know how unpleasant it was for them, but this differentiated it from gooseberries, both of which grew along rivers, hence in Ukrainian and Polish, it’s also called ‘porzeczka’ and ‘porichka,’ especially the red and white varieties. To me, gooseberries even smell stronger.

The English name is also interesting. The English ‘currant’ stems from the Middle English ‘rayson of Corantes’ (‘grapes from Corinth’), where ‘Corantes’ is a distortion of the Greek city Corinth. In the Middle Ages, small dried grapes were actively imported into England from Greece (specifically the region around Corinth) and these dried berries were called ‘raisins of Corinth,’ which later shortened to ‘currant.’ Originally, ‘currant’ referred specifically to raisins, dried grapes (essentially, small raisins). And it still means that in some places.

But then a shift in meaning occurred. Later, when shrubs of the Ribes genus (currant bushes), specifically Ribes rubrum (red currant) and Ribes nigrum (black currant), began to be cultivated in Northern Europe, they were given the same name, since their berries were also small and dark like the Greek raisins. Thus, the word ‘currant’ came to be used to denote both currants and gooseberries 🙂 but later on they were differentiated. Yes, gooseberries and currants turned out to be related both biologically and etymologically.

And do you remember the fairy tale about the good heroes and warriors Dobrynya Nikitich, who fought the three-headed Chudo-Yudo on the Kalinov Bridge spanning the River Smorodina? Well, that river, Smorodina, marked the boundary between the world of the living (Yav) and the world of the dead (Nav).

Pearls and Mother-of-Pearl: Nature’s Fascinating Defense Mechanism | July 14 2025, 20:58

I realized that I don’t know much about pearls and started reading up on them today. It turns out that pearls are formed as a natural defense by oysters to irritation: when a micro-particle (a grain of sand, a piece of shell, or a microorganism) gets into the shell, the oyster begins to cover it with layers of nacre. Nacre (nacre) — the inner layer of shells, thin layers of calcium and protein. Interestingly, nacre and pearls are essentially the same in composition. The word “nacre” comes from German and means “mother of pearl” (Perlmutter). A single layer of nacre can form several times a day to several weeks, and it takes up to 2 years for a full pearl to form.

Wild pearls are extremely rare (one in 10000), as not all mollusks are capable of producing them — only some species can. There is also black pearl, found only in the southern part of the Pacific Ocean, and the colors of natural pearls vary from white and grey to green, blue, and red.

Most of the pearls on the market are cultured: humans manage to “trick” the oyster by placing a bead or a piece of fabric inside the shell so it starts the process of covering it with nacre. In other words, to put it simply, almost all the pearls in the market have a plastic bead inside, and nacre is just a thin “skin” around it. Cultivation of pearls occurs on special farms, where oysters are provided ideal conditions for growth and are regularly cared for. The mortality rate of mollusks after transplant is between 10-40%.

Pearls can burn: this is an organic material (97% calcium and 3% water and proteins), and it does not withstand high temperatures, it also dissolves in vinegar.

It turns out, edible oysters also produce pearls, but they are not as shiny.

Exploring the Luminescent Life of Fireflies | July 05 2025, 05:02

While walking with Yuka, suddenly the owner falls on his knees and digs around in the grass for a while. That’s when I found a firefly and wanted to capture it lighting up. The firefly Photinus pyralis is quite common here, but I never got around to studying it closely.

Interestingly, the females of another genus of fireflies, Photuris, use the flashes of Photinus males to locate and eat them. It has been discovered that the females acquire special steroids called lucibufagins from their prey, which repel spiders.

(While figuring this out, I learned something new. Luciferase, an enzyme responsible for the glow, is extracted from these fireflies. It’s named after the word Lucifer, Latin for “light-bearer.” Interestingly, Greece also had its Lucifer, “light-bearer,” known as the god Phosphorus. Incidentally, the element Phosphorus was discovered by alchemist Hennig Brand through the evaporation of urine. He named the discovered element phosphorus mirabilis, from Latin meaning “miraculous light-bearer.” This just shows how many things in the world are connected.)

How Frequent Tick Bites May Reduce Lyme Disease Risk | July 01 2025, 04:38

#science Today I found another tick on me; it didn’t have time to latch on, but did manage to bite. And like before, I suffer from these tick bites being very itchy and taking a long time to heal. A couple of times because of similar symptoms I ended up in Emergency, where I was diagnosed with Lyme based on symptoms and put on doxycycline, but later tests did not confirm Lyme, though I already took the doxycycline. And if there was anything, it’s long dead. Question is, why do ticks love me so much.

I just found an interesting scientific article about this. “Hypersensitivity to Ticks

and Lyme Disease Risk” (link in comments)

The authors say that many people living in areas with a high prevalence of tick-borne diseases such as Lyme develop a more acute reaction to tick bites—redness and severe itching, a dermatological-hypersensitivity reaction—that’s exactly my case. They analyzed 1,500 cases and concluded that the more frequent a person’s itching after a bite (more than 3 times a year), the lower their chance of contracting Lyme disease—the risk was reduced by about 7 times (odds ratio ~ 0.14, p=0.01).

They write that this is linked to the fact that the itching helps to notice the tick sooner, consequently – remove it faster and prevent the infectious agent from entering the body (borrelia is not transmitted immediately, but after 1–2 days). There may also be immune mechanisms that interfere with the tick’s feeding and transmission of borrelia.

Conclusion: Recurring reactions to tick bites (itching + redness) create a kind of “anti-tick” immunity. This reduces the risk of contracting Lyme disease, and likely, could be the basis for developing a vaccine against tick pathogens. Quite intriguing, because such medications exist for dogs (full protection against ticks), but haven’t been invented for humans yet.

Galactic Etymology: Tracing the Milky Origins in the Night Sky | June 29 2025, 12:57

I am looking at photos and reading material about the Milky Way and noticed that the word galaxy (any) essentially means “milky” from Greek. Κύκλος Γαλαξίας. Essentially, lac from lactose, and gala from galaxy essentially come from the same Proto-Indo-European ģlákts. Unexpected.

Risks of High-Pressure Activities on Eye Health and Hearing | June 28 2025, 23:52

Interesting. I learned, for example, that the human retina is not really attached to the vascular tunic, but is held in place only mechanically by intraocular pressure. Because of this, those who jump from heights or engage in diving, and generally anything that increases intraocular pressure, are at risk of retinal detachment.

(By the way, about pressure, I had a slight barotrauma in my left ear today during airplane landing: after landing there was a lingering feeling of stuffiness and muffled sounds, and while in the air it even hurt a bit. That is, some traces of sensation remained several hours later, but probably, by tomorrow morning I will recover fully).

https://youtu.be/QmX60IgWCGk?si=GrWzDtuZTpFeig-X

Exploring Maya Ruins and Termite Tunnels in Playa del Carmen | June 27 2025, 18:59

Here in Playa del Carmen, there are about a dozen abandoned Maya-era buildings that you can climb over and into, of course free of charge and at any time. Inside one of them, in a small room, I found interesting termite mud tunnels, which I had never seen in person before.