Rethinking Karma: A Crafted Tale of Redemption and Survival | April 27 2026, 21:37

An interesting interview with Ilya Remeslo by Sobchak. But if I were Ilya’s political technologist, I would have suggested a much more coherent story: as if, one morning, he woke up, looked back at the past, and decided to fix his karma, rather than drown. Everything I did before that morning – my past life. We can talk about it, but for me, it is a closed page, I am ashamed of it, and if someday they decide to punish me for it – it would be fair, I am ready. If they punish for today’s stance – it would be unjust, but I am ready nonetheless. Either option is better than drowning, hence the boldness. Such a story would have been much more coherent, and it doesn’t matter if it has anything to do with reality.

From realistic explanations, I keep to myself that the guy was genuinely threatened with death, someone close to the powers that be, unclear why, the reasons could be numerous, and from all the options on what to do, this one had the best chances of staying alive because if the threat is realized now, the ratings will drop even more. Well, if he is jailed, it’s almost state protection from threats.

There’s one more thing. Possibly, this individual made it known to the right people that if he is locked up, some very serious dirt will immediately go to the media, but if nothing happens to him, there will be silence.

Celebrating a Milestone: Rauf Aliyev’s Programming Qualification from 1994 | March 21 2026, 13:54

Mom sent it. This was given to me when I graduated from school. The education was quite good back then, at least. Part of the science classes were conducted at the institute.

A Decade at EPAM: Thriving Through Change and Challenge | January 05 2026, 13:43

10 years at EPAM.

I would have never thought that I would enjoy working in the same place for an entire decade. What’s the secret? At EPAM, I am always evolving: projects change one after another, never letting me get bored.

I am currently on a project at a giant company: over 100 thousand employees and revenue of 30 billion dollars. Before this, it was the automotive industry — a behemoth with a staff of 175 thousand and a turnover of 150 billion. Somewhere around, there was a contract with a company of 80 thousand employees and 35 billion in revenue. True scale and genuinely serious challenges. And earlier, there were cosmetics brands, biotech, and the oil sector. In total, more than 20 projects of various calibers. Despite having over 100% workload every single day. And it seems that this year, I had more vacation than usual, yet still less than I could have taken. I traveled to Costa Rica, Mexico, Seattle, Antalya.

The point is, at each new place you learn something, sometimes from scratch. And that’s freaking awesome. It gives much more energy than if I had been “rooted” in any of these corporations for all 10 years. Perhaps, from a purely financial standpoint, people who stayed in one place at these companies earned more than me, but money isn’t the priority if it means sacrificing interest and enthusiasm. Living life at a job from which you are utterly exhausted is a questionable pleasure.

Last year at EPAM was maximally intense, and I sincerely hope that 2026 will not slow down.

Exploring a Conditional Investment-Based U.S. Visa Program | August 21 2025, 21:23

I wonder if a U.S. visa program would work where specially authorized American investing organizations collectively invest, say, $500,000 in each candidate who files a petition and is ready to pay a hypothetical $20-50K. The money goes to the government, but it returns it monthly with interest. Then, he moves to the U.S., gets a job, and pays back the “investors” from legally earned money, like a student loan. “Investors” help him find a job. If he loses his job, and can’t find another, he can pay from savings for some time, but afterward — he must return home. No savings — go back home. Violated the law (criminal) — go back home. But each such negative case affects whether the “investor” will have the opportunity to invest in new ones.

Investors help with job finding if needed, but there’s no coercion or serfdom, because it doesn’t matter what kind of job the person has, as long as it’s legitimate, and the debt is deducted from the salary. Until the debt is paid, a person’s profile affects the “investor’s” performance indicators, and in case of poor indicators, the investor loses their license or priority.

It’s assumed that, given existing quotas, the “investor” has an interest in finding the smartest and most hardworking people worldwide and subsequently placing them in the local market. If they perform poorly, they simply can’t operate.

After full repayment, he gets the right to citizenship. This could attract talented individuals, support the economy, and ensure responsibility. What do you think?