damn, and I used to find this convenient (and the laptop liked it too)

damn, and I used to find this convenient (and the laptop liked it too)

In the early 2000s, I had a “business” selling the internet at retail – on CDs. I would make agreements with content providers – websites like algolist, openbsd, and cooking recipes to place a “buy this site on CD” banner on every page, and in return I invested time in creating a static version with search functionality and recording it onto discs. Links from the pages led to .nadiske.ru, where there was a large order button and upsells from other projects, related and not. A percentage from each disc went to the content owner. Delivery was done by cash on delivery through the Russian Post (meaning, I sent the discs without prior payment), and I collected the money at the post office. The site effectively had two pages – a product list with checkboxes and an order form. However, there were as many sub-sites as there were partners – on each of them, the main product was listed first, and the rest were upsells. The idea was that since we’re already ordering, let’s get something else too”.
So, several interesting problems arose back then. How to match the money received with the orders posted? For each order, I dynamically formed a price – adding pennies so the price was unique. For the end customer, it made no difference whether they agreed to a price of 150 rubles or 150 rubles and 12 kopecks, but for me, it was convenient for matching. Together with the date, it was quite reliable.
The second problem was where to manage orders with statuses and the like. In the end, I chose Microsoft Access. It pulled XML with new orders from the website. I developed the whole system on Access in a couple of hours. It was ideal. By the way, has Access died out yet?
Interestingly, the top sellers were discs that I had produced just to expand the selection – Unixes and Linux. Understandably, there weren’t any links from partner websites to these, but they were bought as add-ons, and ultimately they topped the sales and were the easiest and cheapest to produce.
Also, I developed a search engine for the CD to search through this content. I don’t remember how, but back then it was possible to embed executable code in the browser that opened index.html from the disc. Either there were ASP inserts and DLLs, or something of that nature.
I closed the project when it became clear that decent internet would eventually reach the regions, and the demand for discs would someday wane. Plus, everything was heading in that direction. Additionally, the disks required updates, and it was a pity to invest more effort and time, especially considering the first point.


Today I came across ARC-AGI-3 tests for AI models. That is, if you think that AI can do anything for you, consider that you have already earned a large part of the $850,000 prize fund – just submit your beautiful code, and let it be the best. But it doesn’t work that way. Humans handle 100% of tasks, while programs have not yet surpassed the 2.5-3% mark. What are those tasks?
The program is given not a textual task but a mini-game. There are no instructions or descriptions of the rules. At each step, the program receives a “frame” — a JSON object with the current state of the field. It is a grid of up to 64×64 cells, where the cells are encoded with numbers from 0 to 15 (representing different colors or types of blocks). The agent has a standardized interface (actions 1–7), including basic steps and the ability to specify specific coordinates (X, Y). But AI does not know beforehand what these actions do! In one task “Action 1” might shift a block to the right, in another repaint it, in a third turn on gravity. To understand the logic, AI must actively “poke with a stick” at the environment. It performs an experimental action, the environment reacts and returns a new frame. The agent must analyze the changes, update its theory about the physics of this particular world, and make the next deliberate step. The game can end with the status WIN, GAME_OVER, or continue further.
Again – humans score 100%, machines – 2-3%. You can try it at the ARC PRIZE website, there are sample tasks available.

It’s interesting that there seem to be no tools available to check how Social Sharing Previews for Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter work for a site that is not yet public. I can think of two solutions for this: simulating social network behavior and creating a page with stripped content but correct headers, which is opened to the public for a minute, then preview generation is performed through the actual tools of FB, LI, Twitter, conclusions are drawn on what to adjust, and the page disappears. The simulation could also be done, seems not too complicated.
I have published a new article about how the interaction between companies and candidates for positions within these companies may look. The main thesis is that we’ve sat too long with these PDF resumes. It feels like a greeting from the last century. There is an interesting trend – essentially, interactive resumes in the form of AI agents for candidates and AI agents for companies, communicating with each other 24/7. Agents in the sense that celebrities and athletes have them. I was quite surprised that there is no movement in this direction, even though technologically, it seems, the required level has been reached.
84 researchers, 40+ laboratories — who’s who in Search & RecSys, all on one page.
https://www.testmysearch.com/who-is-who.html
Google, Meta, Netflix, Spotify, Amazon, CMU, UMass, UCSD, and others — for each person links to their website, Google Scholar, LinkedIn, key papers. Plus the h-index and number of citations from Semantic Scholar.
Made it for myself, because it’s more convenient to quickly see who publishes what. Couldn’t find anything ready-made — had to compile it myself. Seems useful, I hope not only to me.
It’s amazing that Unicode includes such complex “characters” as shown in the picture. This is a single character. When the Unicode table had accommodated all the alphabets of the world, arrows, circles, and there was still a ton of free space left that needed filling, the capacity was used up. It has space for about 1.1 million characters, and font designers are doing their best) Chinese and Korean occupy 71% of the existing characters.
Also, Unicode includes some cool ligatures. For example, the following text is one “character” ﷽ (Basmala). Here on Facebook, it doesn’t display quite right because of the fonts, the full version can be seen here: https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=%EF%B7%BD where ﷺ and ﷻ also live
Moreover, Unicode includes hieroglyphs that do not exist. An investigation in 1997 discovered, for example, the origin of 妛: the compilers wanted to record “山 over 女,” but could not print the composite sign — so they printed 山 and 女 separately, cut them out with scissors, glued them on a sheet and made a copy. On the copy, the seam line of the two pieces of paper looked like a stroke and was included in the hieroglyph. Now it remains so forever

I remind you that I have a group called Engineering Zen on Facebook and Telegram. Recently, there have been posts about:
– How for half a century science condescendingly explained to grandmothers that colds are caused by viruses, not drafts, — and in 2022, it found a mechanism by which grandmothers were partly right.
– People who are currently walking around with plutonium in their chests. Legally, registered with the nuclear regulator, with the instruction “to be returned to the state after death.” The capsule was seriously tested: cremation, plane crash, shotgun blast. It wasn’t radiation that killed the technology.
– Old sailors who poured oil overboard during storms. Not superstition, but working physics — and from it emerged, it seems, the first measurement of the size of a molecule in history. A teaspoon of oil, a pond under London, and Benjamin Franklin. Today, the same effect captures oil spills from satellites.
– Why almost all blue in the animal world is a deception: there’s no pigment at all. Neither in the wings of the morpho butterfly, nor in the feathers of a peacock, nor in your blue eyes. Mammals do not have any blue pigment. But it’s the opposite in plants.
– How the ocean floor is mapped… by looking at its surface from space. Underwater mountains betray themselves through “bumps” on the water — it turns out the sea is not flat at all. Only about a quarter of the sea floor has been measured with a sonar to this day.
– The MRI magnet, which is turned on only once in a lifetime — and then it circles current through a ring for years, without any socket. Even at night, when the clinic is closed. But if the cooling fails — a “quench” occurs, and tons of helium burst out through the pipe to the roof within seconds.
– The theorem by which a sphere can be cut into pieces and assembled into two identical spheres. Not a trick or sophistry — honest mathematics. The catch is that these “pieces” have no volume. At all. Like the coast of Britain has no length.
– Why in a language with three words for colors, the third is always red, and blue appears last. No need to know the language — just count. And why the go signal on Japanese traffic lights is legally “blue.”
– A rescue operation going on in space right now: a robot trying to catch a falling telescope, which has neither handles nor a docking unit — it was built in an era when no one thought of such things. Racing against the atmosphere.
– Lunar dust — the main nightmare of lunar bases. Microscopic sharp glass shards that eat away space suits within hours, stick to everything due to static, and — surprisingly — smell like gunpowder.
– A hypothesis that lasted 85 years and fell during the World Cup final — from a single line on Twitter. A counterexample is verified by a student in a minute, and it’s unclear why it wasn’t found earlier.
– The illusion of “stopped clocks,” which everyone has experienced: you shift your gaze to the second hand — and it has stopped. It turns out, the brain blinds you several times a second — and then edits time retrospectively.
– Ice that does not melt at +300°C — found trapped inside diamonds from the Earth’s mantle. And its even more strange black superheated relative seems to make up the interiors of Uranus and Neptune.
– Why the ads on the stadium boards, which you see on television, physically do not exist — viewers in Brazil, Germany, and Japan see three different sponsors at the same moment.
– A piece of wire mesh that tames fire where it is bound to explode — and on which the entire century of mining labor stood. The inventor gave it to the world for free.
– And for dessert — why a giant NASA rocket is transported not on asphalt, but on river pebbles. They tried asphalt — it went “in waves, like the sea.” Personally verified, I spent an hour looking at that gravel out the window.
Join us to not miss much more interesting stuff.
Engineering Zen
P.S. There is also a group in Telegram with the same name, but there the audience has stopped growing at all and stands at about 100 people, and until I figure out how to manage this, I am temporarily giving up on it.

It’s funny that the Whisper Large-V3 (OpenAI) voice decryption model, when working with Russian, occasionally replaces a random fragment of what it heard with one or several consecutive phrases “The point is that all speeches today speak of the most monstrous disgrace.”
Apparently, it’s also funny that many don’t care about the outcome of the transcription.
At least a thousand examples are found by Yandex and Google
