Exploring the Boundless Spectrum: The World of Animal Hearing | August 29 2025, 17:56

From my notes as I read Ed Yong’s Immense World—

“..It is known that the range of audible frequencies for animals is different from that of humans, but I didn’t realize just how different. Imagine the highest pitch in the world—it would be just under 20 kHz, as it’s considered the upper limit of the audible range. Both the upper and lower limits tend to decrease with age. Most adults can’t hear sounds over 16 kHz. Anything above 20 kHz we call ultrasound.

.

So, it turns out that our closest relatives, chimpanzees, can hear up to 30 kHz, dogs up to 45 kHz, cats up to 85 kHz, mice up to 100 kHz, and moths even up to 300 kHz. Imagine, there are so many high-frequency sounds around us, and how rich their sound world is compared to our limited one. It would be interesting to wear headphones that compress the range from 20-40000 Hz to 20-15000 Hz. Many animals, such as mice, actively use ultrasound for internal communication, beyond the hearing range of their predators.

.

And when the topic of ultrasound comes up, it’s impossible not to mention bats with their echolocation. Turns out, it’s a wildly interesting topic.”

.

Probably everyone knows that bats successfully hunt in caves, where no light penetrates at all, and they don’t crash into stalactites and stalagmites. There’s an English saying, blind as a bat, but actually, they can see. Some species see better, others worse. But let’s talk about echolocation.

.

In general, it’s just radar. The bat screams, the sound bounces off a tree, comes back into its ears, and it gets information about how far away the tree is and whether to slow down or not. But the devil, as they say, is in the details. “Engineering” ones.

.

Firstly, high-frequency sound attenuates quickly, so you need to shout very loudly for something to bounce back from a few meters away. Beyond that, bats simply don’t “see.” So, they do indeed shout very loudly, and it’s a directed scream. Specifically, they measured 138 decibels, the sound level of a jet engine if you stand next to it. But in the ultrasonic range.

.

Secondly, when they scream so loudly, they need to plug their own ears so as not to kill their sensitive apparatus. It turned out that they have special muscles that block the inner ear during the scream.

.

Thirdly, both they and their prey are on the move, very fast and erratic. Meanwhile, the speed of sound is about 343 meters per second. The bat’s brain must calculate the difference between the signal and the echo, taking into account both its own movement through space and the movement of the prey. It turned out that the bat’s vocal muscles can contract up to 200 times a second. Moreover, the frequency depends on the phase of the hunt. 200 times—that’s the final phase, when the moth is right in front of the nose, and tiny movements need to be tracked.

.

Fourthly, the bat’s brain also has to cope with creating interference between what was shouted out two moments ago and what was shouted out a moment ago. Considering that the sound can echo off the far wall and the near branch. Plus there are waves from the cries of other bats, and they’re usually very numerous in caves. To manage this, they seem to throw a bit different modulation, plus this musculature allows them to “fire” very short pulses—a few milliseconds—and to renew pulses at their own frequency through very short intervals. Imagine what kind of computer in their brains performs the inverse Fourier transform.”

.

So, all this works pretty well in small groups. But for example, the Brazilian free-tailed bats live in groups of millions. Really, together 20 million mouths shout something and wait for their echo from the walls and each other. You can’t just pick modulation and frequencies that easily, but somehow they manage. Not perfectly, and if they gather in a really big bunch in the cave, then they perform their commute to the hunt and back to the cave “by memory” – probably due to issues with echolocation. When a “door” was placed at the entrance to the cave, a bunch of bats crashed into it.

.

Fifth, consider how they determine distance. It’s necessary to calculate the difference between the signal sent and the signal received (amid a bunch of noise from other bats), and for hunting, it needs to be calculated very precisely. And sound of course isn’t light, but 343 meters per second is also a lot. So studies have shown that bats can recognize differences as little as 1-2 millionths of a second, which allows them to determine distance to fractions of a millimeter. In other words, our eyes are significantly less accurate than their ears.

.

Plus, a moth is actually a fairly complex 3D creation that reflects sound differently with its different parts. Otherwise, bats would eat everything that moves. They recognize. In complete darkness. A mouse’s scream contains a whole palette of frequencies, which reflect differently off parts of a moth, and the mouse’s brain somehow manages to translate this into a coherent picture. Moreover, for each of the constituent frequencies, the delay will be its own.

.

Then, all this information is layered over time. Roughly speaking, a snapshot from one point is combined with a snapshot from a point a half meter to the right, then from a point half a meter forward, and so on many, many times, which enhances “sharpness” and detail. Overall, it’s the same with us – we only see the spot in front of us clearly while the rest is constructed by the brain. But the brain of a bat weighs 1-2 grams against our half kilogram.

.

Think about it, you’re flying with such a built-in radar, and in front of you are two branches at the same distance, which produce essentially the same echo for their ears. And to distinguish them and understand that it’s not one object but two, you really need an advanced brain.

.

So, they send pulses lasting 1-20 ms, plus longer pauses between pulses. The pulses are complex in terms of frequencies, so such bats are called frequency modulation (FM) bats. But there are about 160 species that have a much longer cry—many tens of milliseconds but with short pauses, and instead of a complex gamma of frequencies, these use a pure “note.” These bats are called CF—constant frequency. So here’s the thing with these bats—there’s a problem with the Doppler effect, which is an increase in frequency as the distance decreases. Since their brain is tuned to a strict frequency, like 87 kHz for example, they might lose their prey if the echo that reaches their ears is shifted in frequency. And what they do—they shout at a sound speed lower, so that after the Doppler effect it arrives at the correct frequency for the brain.”

.

Incidentally, their radar has two modes—forward and downward, the echoes from which are processed separately. The downward radar provides information about position in space, and the forward radar—about the position in space of the prey.

.

When I researched the subject, I found that yes, after 20 kHz humans hear nothing, with one exception—frequencies of 2.4 GHz and 10 GHz, which actually belong to the microwave range. Yes, humans can “hear” these frequencies, but not with the ear, but “hear.” This phenomenon is called the microwave auditory effect or the Frey effect. Initially, this effect was registered by people working near radars during World War II, and the sounds they perceived were not heard by others. It turned out that when pulsed or modulated microwave radiation was applied to areas around the cochlea, it was absorbed by the tissues of the inner ear, accompanied by their thermal expansion. In the course of this process, shockwaves are produced, perceived by humans as sound, which no one else hears. It was also discovered that with the appropriate choice of the modulating signal, it is possible to transmit information to a person in the form of individual words, phrases, and other sounds. Depending on the radiation parameters, the sound created in the head can be irritating, cause nausea, and even disable. The volume of the perceived sound can be changed, but acoustic trauma is not possible, as the eardrum does not participate in the process at all. Generally speaking, the method of specifically transmitting sonic messages that are absolutely inaudible to others opens up a whole bouquet of possibilities. I wonder if research is still being conducted on this topic. Google shows that they used to be pretty intense.”

I once published this along with a video, and Facebook reckons that if you publish a video, the text should be one, at most two lines. And in the end, almost no one saw this text. Everyone just watched the video of a bat flying around my apartment 🙂

Exploring a Conditional Investment-Based U.S. Visa Program | August 21 2025, 21:23

I wonder if a U.S. visa program would work where specially authorized American investing organizations collectively invest, say, $500,000 in each candidate who files a petition and is ready to pay a hypothetical $20-50K. The money goes to the government, but it returns it monthly with interest. Then, he moves to the U.S., gets a job, and pays back the “investors” from legally earned money, like a student loan. “Investors” help him find a job. If he loses his job, and can’t find another, he can pay from savings for some time, but afterward — he must return home. No savings — go back home. Violated the law (criminal) — go back home. But each such negative case affects whether the “investor” will have the opportunity to invest in new ones.

Investors help with job finding if needed, but there’s no coercion or serfdom, because it doesn’t matter what kind of job the person has, as long as it’s legitimate, and the debt is deducted from the salary. Until the debt is paid, a person’s profile affects the “investor’s” performance indicators, and in case of poor indicators, the investor loses their license or priority.

It’s assumed that, given existing quotas, the “investor” has an interest in finding the smartest and most hardworking people worldwide and subsequently placing them in the local market. If they perform poorly, they simply can’t operate.

After full repayment, he gets the right to citizenship. This could attract talented individuals, support the economy, and ensure responsibility. What do you think?

Exploring Shepherdstown: A Hidden Gem in West Virginia | August 20 2025, 13:00

From the trip to Shepherdstown, WV. A small town an hour’s drive from home, founded over 260 years ago. Hardly any tourists, but the few small restaurants and shops compete against each other for the attention and interest of passing travelers.

From the street, there’s an open window at the Lost Dog Coffee cafe. Inside works a very colorful bartender and owner, Garth Emmery Janssen. The coffee shop’s Facebook tagline reads “Founded in 1995 by two crazy punk rockers. We are not normal. We do things correctly. it’s ❤️”

Oat milk latte, please. Dear sir, Garth answers me, that wouldn’t exactly be a latte then. But if you insist, of course. Okay, I say, make it the right way, it doesn’t matter to me. The coffee turned out delicious.

Next, there was an art studio, which I have already written about in previous posts, a handmade cosmetics store where the owner eagerly shares her chemical experiments on the quest for perfect creams and soaps, and where she sells prints drawn by her daughter, who, unfortunately, has grown up and no longer wants to draw.

A very homely atmosphere everywhere. And a nice little town. It lacked modernity, and yes, our regions are all like that, with dust from the past, modernity is somewhat cumbersome.

Misguided Lessons with Grok: A Bilingual Blunder | August 19 2025, 23:43

Today Grok blew my mind. I say, teach me French. He says, ok, how do you say “book”? I say “le livre”. He says “wrong! la livra”. 😳The car drives itself anyway, decided to record the dialogue. He’s not convinced. At all, insists on his point. La livra and that’s it. I’m afraid Grok will teach the bad stuff in his Language Tutor mode.

I remembered a story from “Memoirs of Pushkin” by M. E. Yuzefovich, dating to 1829:

he had several books with him, including Shakespeare. One day in our tent, he translated some scenes to me and my brother. I had once studied English, but having not fully learned it, I subsequently forgot it. However, I still recognized its sounds. In Pushkin’s reading, the English pronunciation was so distorted that I suspected his knowledge and decided to test it. The next day, I invited his relative, Zakhar Chernyshev, who knew English as his native language, warned him what was going on, and called over Pushkin with Shakespeare. He willingly started translating for us. Chernyshev burst into laughter at the first words read by Pushkin: “First tell me, in which language are you reading?” Pushkin laughed in turn, explaining that he had taught himself English, and therefore he reads English letters like Latin ones. But the fact is that Chernyshev found the translation completely correct and the language understanding impeccable.”

Anna Derevenitskaya

From Miniare to Miniature: The Evolution of Book Illustration | August 14 2025, 14:52

How interesting, the word “Miniature” turns out not to derive from minimus (Latin), meaning “smallest”, but from miniare, meaning “to color with cinnabar or red lead”.

The word is connected to the practice of book illustration in the Middle Ages. You have probably seen images of medieval manuscripts with dense black text and a large, decorated initial letter. In the earliest bound books, they were not so ornate—just a big letter, colored red to stand out. In Italy, the verb miniare referred to the stage of painting red initials, usually left until last, and the art of illustration itself was called miniatura.

Over time, these initial decorations became increasingly complex, evolving into fully developed scenes with little figures, animals, and buildings. But, of course, since the scenes had to fit into the corner of a page, they were very small. And therefore, because a miniature in a book was like a tiny painting, the meaning of the word expanded—it came to denote any small version of something larger.

Nostalgic Games of Paper Battles and Guesses | August 14 2025, 12:45

I remembered how many hours I spent in class playing various games on paper like “Battleship”. So much paper was used up in childhood for all that! Everyone knows Battleship, but can you recognize the games in the attached pictures? There were more games, but I think I only played these. There was also a game where you see who can make more words from the letters of one long word, but that’s really for introverts 🙂

Exploring Must-Have Russian Books for Science and Art Lovers | August 10 2025, 14:01

Can you recommend some interesting books to bring (or order) from Russia to the USA, considering my interests (popular science, primarily local non-translations from English, as I can read the originals in English, and perhaps drawing) and various other intriguing things (see part of my collection)?

Exploring the Intrigue of 657 New Words in the Russian Orthographic Dictionary | August 08 2025, 18:46

657 new words were added to the RAN orthographic dictionary — for instance, “smoothie,” “TikToker,” “powerbank,” and “SVO.” I decided to check out their complete list. Let’s head to the Akademos website and type “2025” in the search.

(Putin’s advisor wrote that “SVO” is correct, but anglicisms are unnecessary. In my opinion, anglicisms are perfectly fine, but with everything else — they truly break the Russian language. Check it out)

Noble-metallic, Bodrich-style and Radimich-style, Byzantinizing, suitable-for-vine-growing, humanizing, icy-frosty, two-strap, Dregovichanka, jacaranda, children-foreign-phoned, “Devo: Virgin Mary Devo” (that’s an entry in the dictionary), fear-of-women, back-of-the-chair, koin, literature-centricity, petty-little-thing (is it describing a woman or a coin?), over-door-woman, Nibelung-esque, nonillion (I guess needed for fining Google), deaeration, Palaiologos and Pantalone, varicolored, petrosphere, to preexist, family-preservation, strongly-fleeing and moderately-fleeing, scrambled.

Interestingly, there is an entry “firmly promised,” written with a space inside.

And there is Sloboda Ukraine there.

There’s offline-messenger! and proxy-list. And torrent-client.

In 2025 “FIFA (International Federation of Association Football)” and “Dictionary of Modern Russian Literary Language” were added to the orthographic dictionary. There’s separately, “Doomsday: Doomsday plane”

There’s taphophilia — a fascination with cemeteries.

And there is philosemitism. As I understand it, it’s the same as Judophilia — manifestations of interest, respect for the Jewish people, their historical significance, and a positive appraisal of the influence of Judaism in history. Where do they even get such words?

Added to the dictionary were west-northwest-er (apparently, a direction slightly west of northwest) and west-southwest-er.

There’s late-developing and later-developing.

If you go on a diet, know that there’s a word for de-fatting. And then there’s a chance that you’ll become an ectomorph — also a word in this dictionary.

There are also drone and pilot-borehole.

Yet among the new words of 2025 there’s “coup d’état”.

Exploring Unusual Time Signatures: From Prokofiev to Pink Floyd | July 28 2025, 05:32

A small concert at a Catholic university. Prokofiev’s 7th sonata features a tricky musical meter — 7/8. It’s interesting, but it seems I’ve never heard or known anything else in this meter. Early 20th-century composers were quite the innovators. Oh, I remember now. The closest to 7/8 was in Pink Floyd’s “Money” with their 7/4.

Faces of Language: Understanding the Human and Animal “Face” Across Cultures | July 25 2025, 16:35

I read about a fly on my windowsill, it’s a predatory critter, and its face is described on Wikipedia. Just like that, face. It got me thinking, is the word “face” applicable to animals other than humans (let’s skip the discussion of whether the term animal applies to humans). On the same Wikipedia, but on the face page, the face is only human. Yet, it is written that in professional terminology (veterinary, ornithology, entomology) it is quite appropriate to speak of the “facial part of the head” of an animal. For example, ornithologists at Cornell University use the term “face” specifically in descriptions of owls. Well, fine, we have a face, others have a snout. And birds? A snout in feathers? A beak is something else entirely.

In English too, by the way, things are not so simple. Even a cube has faces. In other European languages, the boundary between a human “face” and an animal one is more or less clearly drawn. Italians use faccia only for humans and muso for animals; faccia for a cat or dog would be inappropriate and even offensive. In French, visage usually means “human face,” and for animals, it’s gueule, museau, tête, etc. In Polish, there’s twarz for people and pysk/morda for beasts; moreover, the word morda in relation to a person is a crude insult (and in Russian too, only adding nationality to it). In Scandinavian languages (“ansigt” in Danish, “ansikte” in Swedish) “face” is also almost always human.

There’s also the word “physiognomy.” Interestingly, it only later came to denote a face. Essentially, this word means “the study of facial features to determine character.” It consists of φύσις (physis) – “nature, essence, character” and γνώμων (gnomon) – “indicator, determining.”

And then I remembered the word “unflattering.” Strange word, right? How can a conversation be unflattering? Turns out, its definition is as follows: “not based on flattery, the desire to please someone; impartial, fair.” So formally, Vitsyn could exclaim, “long live the most unflattering court in the world!” I’m not joking, for example, Saltykov-Shchedrin writes: “At the present time, in all corners of Russia, even the most backward people are beginning to recognize the vital need for a lawful and unflattering court.” “I must confess, I was very nervous, handing my brainchild over to the unflattering judgment of the editorial staff” (D. N. Mamin-Sibiriyak, “Features from the Life of Pepko,” 1894).

Actually, an interesting word. In Russian, its only decent synonyms are snout, mug, phiz, physiognomy, dial, and very memorable indecent ones.